There was an article in Saturday's WSJ that caught my eye... and brain... and that article is available to the general public, not just WSJ subscribers (thank The Deity At Hand, coz that makes what follows much easier). The opening grafs:
It's no secret that hundreds of millions of people around the world now routinely use the Internet to indulge their sexual curiosity. Today you can ogle more naked bodies in a single minute online than the most promiscuous Victorian could have seen in a lifetime. Because this online activity leaves behind a trail of digital crumbs, for the first time we can gather reliable data on the erotic interests of a broad swath of humanity.
My colleague Sai Gaddam and I have analyzed a billion of these web searches, using data sets that firms like AOL and Excite make publicly available, obtaining other data from adult web sites, and using web-analysis techniques to gather additional data.
One of our most interesting findings was that women are very different from men in how they use these online services. All across the planet, what most women seek out, in growing numbers, are not explicit scenes of sexual activity but character-driven stories of romantic relationships.
Well, how's that for an opening? OK... it should come as no surprise that women are different than male chauvinist piggies when it comes to online erotica but let's dive deeper.
The female cortex contains a highly developed system for finding and scrutinizing a prospective partner—a system that might be dubbed the Miss Marple Detective Agency. Agatha Christie's fictional sleuth is often dismissed as scatterbrained, but she is actually a shrewd judge of character and harbors deep knowledge of the dark side of human nature. She uses her surprising analytical acumen to solve mysteries that have stumped the police.
Using similar investigative skills, the female brain evaluates all available evidence regarding a potential mate's social, emotional and physical qualities to make an all-important decision: Is he Mr. Right or Mr. Wrong? Only if Miss Marple gives her stamp of approval do physical arousal and psychological arousal harmoniously unite in the female brain.
Do tell! Really? Who'd a thunk it? Taking my tongue out of my cheek, this comes as no great surprise to YrHmblScrb, Gentle Reader. But going on...
Female erotica demonstrates how the detective agency operates—and how it differs from the much simpler male brain. Whereas two-minute video clips are the most popular form of contemporary erotica for men, the most popular form for women remains the romance novel, an artifact that takes many hours to digest. Like pornography, the romance novel has established a strong presence in the digital domain. It is the primary engine behind the electronic book boom. Currently, three of the top 10 books on Kindle are e-romances.
Ah, now we get to the crux of the story, which goes on to give statistical, demographic, and anecdotal evidence as to how profoundly different women are than men when it comes to erotica, which leads us... that would be me, actually... into real-life situations and experiences. Herewith an observation, if you will.
I've often wondered how I came to have my modest success in love (and its close relative, the brief fling and/or affair). I've mentioned that I was never any good at the Meat Market game, what with being able to count the "your place or mine?" one-night stands I've had in my life on the fingers of one hand. Nope... that was never me. I always wound up in relationships with friends, better defined as women I'd known for some period of time... varying from at least a couple o' few days to weeks and even months... mostly coz I don't have a flashing smile, good looks, a hunky bod, or any other outstanding physical characteristic. Ya want proof? OK, then, here's an icon from my past:
See? That's me in my prime... at 30 years... and The Second Mrs. Pennington, who was really in her prime, at 19. What splendid physical specimens, eh? Well, at least one of us was, but we digress...
That framed picture sat on the dresser in The Second Mrs. Pennington's and my bedroom for the 20-year duration of our marriage... and on her maiden's dresser, prior to our marriage; it's a picture of she and I on the day we met (back story), accompanied by free verse (?) I wrote on a whim and a napkin whilst waiting for a train in Nagoya towards the end of our New Years trip in 1975. (A narrative about that trip (in two parts) begins here if'n you're interested.) So there's the physical evidence of my (ahem) hunkiness... but that napkin, and the fact she saved it for so long, demonstrates a larger point: our relationship was based less on the physical than the mental (on her part, not mine, in the beginning.). I think that poem was part of the evidence collected and filed away by the Miss Marple Detective Agency, TSMP Division.
That framed picture sat on the dresser in The Second Mrs. Pennington's and my bedroom for the 20-year duration of our marriage... and on her maiden's dresser, prior to our marriage; it's a picture of she and I on the day we met (back story), accompanied by free verse (?) I wrote on a whim and a napkin whilst waiting for a train in Nagoya towards the end of our New Years trip in 1975. (A narrative about that trip (in two parts) begins here if'n you're interested.) So there's the physical evidence of my (ahem) hunkiness... but that napkin, and the fact she saved it for so long, demonstrates a larger point: our relationship was based less on the physical than the mental (on her part, not mine, in the beginning.). I think that poem was part of the evidence collected and filed away by the Miss Marple Detective Agency, TSMP Division.
That last point brings me around full-circle. I never really saw a description of the "Miss Marple" effect in print until yesterday but I intuitively understood it, even as a callow youth. TSMP and I were "an item" on that cold night in Nagoya, but we were not yet betrothed. That would come later, after she completed her Miss Marple analysis... part of which was a demand that I give her a detailed, written accounting of my philosophy of life (yet more evidence for the MMDA), which I did, written in a very long letter to her while I was off TDY in Thailand. That account survives to this day and I may print it at some time in the future, provided I retrieve it from the archives, currently resting at SN2's house in the suburbs of Pittsburgh.
You've hit on the source of my "Feh"-ness about the royal wedding. (Well one of the two sources at least, the other one being aptly represented here.) The "romance novel" aspect of it.
ReplyDeleteWomen are like little kids this way. And I mean kids now -- you have to dope them up, literally with some kind of mind-altering drug to get them to pay attention to their teacher or their homework for more than a minute, but an eleven-hour stretch of "World of Warcraft" is no problem. Similarly, if you watch The Godfather with your sweetie, she'll suddenly realize the kitchen floor needs mopping and can't wait another minute for it before Sonny is screwing his mistress during the wedding reception.
But things happen in The Godfather. The story is driven by situational change. In a romance novel, this doesn't happen quite so often and when it does, that isn't the point of the story. The story just reveals things. Men are likely to reject the story when it catches them in some endless loop. To the point of being irritated. I still haven't forgiven them for that X-Files piece of crap. Season 10, we're still waiting for Scully and Mulder to bury the bone...gah.
I don't pretend to understand what's going on here. Women are more capable of seeing nuances -- or -- for them it's about the journey and not the destination. I've yet to extract a coherent answer about the difference between waiting for Bones & Booth to make the beast with two backs in Season 5, versus the same dance doing on in Season 1. So I'm inclined to think women can be duped into going in circles. But I'm also inclined to think they're seeing something I'm not seeing.
By the way: If the study found out the men are interested in what the women are interested in, and the women are interested in what the men are in interested in - the conclusion would not have been that men have the more complex minds, but that women are more efficient in spending their time. That much I'll guarantee. But that's what we call "science" nowadays. It's like the moon and the tides, don't wonder about it, just let it be.
I don't see myself in any of this, Morgan. Maybe it depends on the kind of women you have in your life, but it doesn't represent me or the women in my family and probably many others.
ReplyDeleteI tend to agree with Bec, Morgan, assuming she was commenting on your comment and not the WSJ article. The women in my life have generally been well grounded, intelligent, and perceptive beings... more or less. There have been the odd exceptions here and there, tho.
ReplyDeleteI'm with Bec and Buck on this one.
ReplyDeleteThe women in my life have generally been well grounded, intelligent, and perceptive beings... more or less. Most of us are, and like your 'odd exceptions' part, I've met a few of tose too. The 'moon bats' I just choose not to associate with. They annoy me the point of wanting to biff 'em up-side the head. ;)
It is really sad now. I often get emails that dare me to click on them and see something so raunchy my cigar will fall out of my mouth.
ReplyDeleteThe Internet is a vast wasteland in that regard.
I am quite a prude, and like a cat, after eating a real bird, I don't really get excited by pictures or toys. I do like a good romantic short story though. I couldn't read a whole Novel of that crap though.
Actually, sex is about the fourth thing on my list right now, and I haven't made it past the second thing (chocolate) in a long time.
Seeing other people working the hydraulics theory to its conclusion, midgets, she-males, fatso's, etc, yawn...
It does me good to just be regular.
I love old romance movies. It is amazing how fun they are and they don't even show any sex. I like modern romances, but I'd can do without long explicit sex scenes. Same with romance novels. I like a good mystery or interesting conflict along with some fun romance and some wit. I can skip the sex scenes or find writers who do not go into great detail. I'm sure there are women who dig that sort of thing, but I think most women are into romance. And it is the little things that can mean the most - sometimes very odd things.
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of romance... For some reason I got into reading a whole lot about Lizzie Borden and her sister Emma last year.
ReplyDeleteA young woman trapped by the New England culture she was part of. You have to wonder how she would have thrived as a madam in San Francisco. Earning her own way, instead of waiting for scraps from papa.
There is a genre of short stories that end in murder, but not just for the sake of killing. You have to understand how her parents killed her socially, to understand why she would want to crush their skulls. Crush them she did, and then had a wonderful life.
So I tried my hand at writing a few short stories of that genre. I must have a romantic streak in me, or, at least one where violence is just around the corner.
Alas, my submissions were rejected. I was thinking the stories were well done, since spending many months on drafts and development.
When I saw what had been published, I also saw how/why I missed the mark. Romance writing is difficult. You really have to be a "smoothy" with words that no one uses at the laundromat anymore.
Just don't make it all so technical, ok?
ReplyDeleteResponding to the early relationship thing: I like reviewing the photos from the early days of any relationship. I guess the "We" haven't been caught up in the minutia of day to day living, just enjoying the newness of love. Or more importantly, like.
P.S. What be the deal with the Red Wings? Disappointing.
Deb: I hear ya on the "annoy" bits.
ReplyDeleteI often get emails that dare me to click on them and see something so raunchy my cigar will fall out of my mouth.
Ya need a better spam filter, Anon. ;-)
I think most women are into romance.
I had a housemate once upon a time whose Mom sent her a weekly box stuffed full of Harlequin romance novels. The girl would establish herself on our couch on Saturday morning and would not budge (except for drain and refill operations) until every single novel had been consumed. I had NO idea Harlequin was such a prolific publisher until that time.
Axé: Wow. I'm sorry your budding career never took off. Bummer. Especially for reminding me about the laundromat. ;-)
Darryl: The two games were close but I'm just as disappointed as you, prolly more so.