Today we're enjoying our first outdoor Happy Hour in quite a while and it is VERY nice to be sitting outside in a warm late-autumn sun... beer, book, and cigar in (at?) hand. Our soundtrack today is the Rolling Stones... and how could it NOT be, seein' as how we continue to read Keef's memoirs, albeit slowly but oh-so-deliberately. And so it came to this, one of my all-time faves...
About which (to begin with), this:
“Wild Horses” almost wrote itself. It was really a lot to do with, once again, fucking around with the tunings. I found these chords, especially doing it on a twelve-string to start with, which gave the song this character and sound. There’s a certain forlornness that can come out of a twelve-string. I started off, I think, on a regular six-string open E, and it sounded very nice, but sometimes you just get these ideas. What if I open tuned a twelve-string? All it meant was translate what Mississippi Fred McDowell was doing—twelve-string slide—into five-string mode, which meant a ten-string guitar. I now have a couple custom built for that. It was one of those magical moments when things come together. It’s like “Satisfaction.” You just dream it, and suddenly it’s all in your hands. Once you’ve got the vision in your mind of wild horses, I mean, what’s the next phrase you’re going to use? It’s got to be “couldn’t drag me away.”
That’s one of the great things about songwriting; it’s not an intellectual experience. One might have to apply the brain here and there, but basically it’s capturing moments. Jim Dickinson, bless him—he died August 15, 2009, while I was writing this book—will say later on what “Wild Horses” was “about.” I’m not sure. I never thought about songwriting as writing a diary, although sometimes in retrospect you realize that some of it is like that.
What is it that makes you want to write songs? In a way you want to stretch yourself into other people’s hearts. You want to plant yourself there, or at least get a resonance, where other people become a bigger instrument than the one you’re playing. It becomes almost an obsession to touch other people. To write a song that is remembered and taken to heart is a connection, a touching of bases. A thread that runs through all of us. A stab to the heart. Sometimes I think songwriting is about tightening the heartstrings as much as possible without bringing on a heart attack.That's from Life, of course. "Wild Horses" and I go back to the day "Sticky Fingers" was released, days that found me on Turkey's beautiful Black Sea coast and in the throes of a love affair with a (then) unobtainable woman. The song remained a favorite down through the years, mainly for the plaintive and oh-so-familiar emotions the song evokes. These days the lyrics take on an entirely different but no less applicable meaning. I'd be thinking of this:
I watched you suffer a dull aching painThat, of course, is a story much too long to go into. It's true what Keef sez, tho: the best tunes are all about tightening the heartstrings, a stab to the heart. What's funny-strange is how the meaning and/or relevance changes down thru the years yet remains as true as it ever was. Perhaps even more so.
Now you've decided to show me the same
But no sweet, vain exits or offstage lines
Could make me feel bitter or treat you unkind
Buck, I think I've mentioned that I was never that much of a Stones fan. But this song, which I confess I never heard before, makes me realize what I've missed. I really like it and what Keef has to say about it as well.
ReplyDeleteThat "connection" he seeks in the writing of a song, that "touching of bases," that "thread that runs through all of us," reminds me of what a famous poet, John Keats, said about poetry: "Poetry ... should ...strike the reader as a wording of his own highest thoughts, and appear almost a remembrance." Keef and Keats both seem to be trying to find some universal in their reader/listener to connect to.
I read those links to the older posts as well. Enjoyed them. BTW, somebody should write a song about that "white boat."
Finally, how far is Portales from Tuscon?
I'm done. Sorry to ramble on so long.
I wouldn't worry about Tucson.
ReplyDeleteDiscarded lovers (men too) have a way of getting on with life. My only regret is that my first love died of cancer, and I didn't find out about it for two years. Someone asked me:
"So, what do you think about _____ dying?"
Say what!??
Even though we both moved on, I still would have poured some Ale with her. There is no God.
The Stones are hard for me, because I really couldn't see through their commercialism, until many many years later.
I kind of put them up there with the Monkeys, and the Archies. I can see the value of some of their art now, but I still view their work through a brown bottle, and Jaggers voice still mostly vibrates my last tooth I have left.
And that is the beauty of music - of all kinds. It transcends time and space; it connects us to our past with a bridge to our future.
ReplyDeleteDan: The Stones aren't renowned for their ballads but they DO have more than a few such. I really do believe that they are the "World's Greatest Rock 'n' Roll band," even if they gave themselves that name.
ReplyDeleteYour point about connections is true. I think the best music is poetry all its own, too, just in a different form.
It's 606 miles from Tucson to P-Ville... or a long day's drive. I've done it before... in disguise. ;-)
Anon: You're right about moving on. I'm sure the lady who threatened to emasculate me 30 years ago prolly doesn't remember my name now.
Your story about your first love is sad, indeed. I feel for you, and I'm dead serious.
I'll choose to ignore your Stones comparisons; we can agree to disagree. ;-)
Kris: Yup!
What's that song "no, I don't regret anything." Edith had a 100 times wilder life than I will ever have (wait, maybe 1000, I can't even find the energy to get up and pee anymore...) but what life I had, I have no regrets, nor should anyone, because it is so short anyway.
ReplyDeleteIt's kind of neat to see the Stones in old age. How they managed to survive the industry, let alone the abuses, is amazing. I hope they donate their bodies to science, as I'm sure they must have something worth studying.
Then it would be cool to (what's that called) plastisize their bodies and go on an endless tour.
When I read the post, it made me think of Edgar Allan Poe and his reasoning for his writing (in and essay). He talks about evoking emotions of the readers through his writing and even the use of certain sounds in his poetry.
ReplyDeleteBut "to stretch yourself into other people's hearts...or at least get a resonance" is poetry itself.
As I was listening to the music, Jes hollered from the other room, "Who is that singing?" When I told her, she was surprised - she liked it.
There's a song that Kenny Chesney does called 'I Go Back' that describes this whole thing. Because I listen to the radio all day, every day, there are a lot of times that a song will come on that takes me somewhere else or remind me of someone I once loved. Thanks Buck.
ReplyDeleteAs for Tucson, go ahead and make a call. Only so many more nights to go in our short time dance called life. Nothing wrong with reaching out and reconnecting with friends, at the very least they can remind us of our fallibility.
ReplyDeleteBuck,
ReplyDeleteEver heard this one?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1qHfWM_abA
Even though I hated the Stones (I was the guy downstairs screaming "Turn that shit DOWN!",) this one always blew me away. When I heard Rowan doing it years later with Old And In The Way I realized I wasn't the only one that had to learn it.
Helluva song.
There are many pieces of music that have an ability to "overwhelm" me -- as in to recreate that mood, that specific feeling -- whether it was good or bad.
ReplyDeleteAnd that makes me sometimes feel a bit resentful for it happening so easily. That I can just slide right into it. To just go right back there. Which is not always the best idea for the bad parts.
For the good parts, of course that's quite different.
That's what makes music so damn intriguing.
I used to focus so much more on the lyrics than the tune -- until music took a turn away from tunes. Now I like to think how they dance together to worm themselves into our memories, figure out a way to open some of those memories and launch them to the surface. Sometimes it's a good thing, sometimes amusing, sometimes painful.
ReplyDeleteHaving not read your earlier posts before, I did enjoy your reverie. Yet another peek into who exactly this guy who calls himself Buck is.
Maybe a daytrip to Tucson shouldn't be ruled out of the question. But, being a member of the fairer sex, I'd advise you to take a wingman if I were you!
It's kind of neat to see the Stones in old age.
ReplyDeleteThat it IS, especially given the way they lived (as you noted). To have burned the candle at both ends and still have so much left is just unreal, if not obscene. We should ALL be so lucky. And I hear ya bout "no regrets."
Lou: You're spot on about the poetry aspect. The more I read Richards' biography, the more amazed I am at the guy. I didn't think he was all that deep. And GOOD on Jess!!
Deb: I used to listen to the radio at work all day, as well. And I had the same sort of reactions, for better or worse. ;-)
Darryl: Tucson is out of the question. You simply can't go back, particularly where women are concerned. That's my story and I'm stickin' to it.
Rob: There are a LOT of covers of "Wild Horses" out there, but I'd never heard Old and In The Way's version. Thanks for that!
Kath: I feel much the same about a song that can play my heartstrings like a freakin' instrument: I resent it. Especially when my reactions tend to be VERY visceral in some cases.
Moogie: I agree to the max on the "good, amusing, and painful" thing. Thanks for reading the archives, and thanks for the kind words about same (that goes for you, too, Dan... I didn't mention this before). And see my comment to Darryl about Tucson: I can't go there. Metaphorically, of course. ;-)