Tuesday, September 16, 2008

The Incredible Lightness of Being... A Dim-o-crat

I’m not the first person to note that some of the more perceptive comment on our presidential election comes from beyond our shores. There’s a lot to be said for a “disinterested” perspective… or as disinterested as one can be about an American presidential election (and no, that’s not ethnocentric hubris. It’s just fact). Case in point… Clive Crook, writing in Sunday’s Financial Times (free registration required):


For Mr McCain to win the election against the odds that faced him pre-Palin – with the economy in the tank and the incumbent Republican president setting records for unpopularity – would be sensational enough. For this to happen because of his vice-presidential pick, a decision that is usually of next to no consequence, beggars belief. The Democrats had to bring all their resources to getting themselves into this fix. They proved equal to the task.


As I argued last week, Mr Obama’s own initial reaction to the Palin nomination was exactly right. All the party had to do was follow his lead. Mr Obama, in effect, would give her enough rope; her inadequacies would reveal themselves in due course; it cost nothing, in the meantime, to be courteous, and to keep pressing on the issues, where the Democrats still enjoy an advantage with most voters. Ms Palin’s first television interview last week, an adequate but far from stellar performance, affirmed the wisdom of that course.


But the Democratic talking-heads had to exult in their disdain for Ms Palin and all she represents – namely, a good part of the electorate whose support Mr Obama needs. In the space of a few days, they irreversibly damaged Mr Obama’s candidacy and transformed this election.


[…]


Certainly, the Democrats can see they are in a hole. Somehow, though, the word has gone out: “Keep digging.” Mr Obama is also urged to be less cool and lose his temper. Voters adore an angry candidate, you see. “Dig faster, and be more angry,” is the advice coming down from the political geniuses who decided it was a fine idea to laugh at Ms Palin in the first place. A recurring television image in the past few days has been the split-screen contrast between a serenely smiling Republican operative and a fulminating red-faced Democrat about to have a stroke.


Mr. Crook puts his finger on something that frankly has amazed me over the past week or ten days. You don’t have to be a frickin’ rocket scientist to realize that dissing Mrs. Palin ain’t exactly… umm… smart. One could possibly cut the Democrats some slack for their initial reactions to Governor Palin… but to keep on keepin’ on like they've been doing? It's absolutely, positively inexplicable to anyone with three inter-connected, fully-functioning synapses.


A quick look at any of the recent polls would tell ya Mrs. Palin is a bona fide phenomenon. The woman struck a chord with the conservative electorate and that chord has yet to quit resonating throughout the Right and the entire nation, actually. And the Democrats seemingly just don’t get it. On the other hand, I think they DO get it. But the fact is they can neither help… nor stop… themselves in expressing their utter contempt for a woman like Sarah Palin and those terribly unsophisticated rubes who identify with her. And that, Gentle Reader, is real hubris at work.


Keep digging, Lefties. It’s oh-so-amusing to watch your slow-motion train wreck in progress. As it will be to watch you rend your garments, don your ritual sackcloth and ashes, and listen to your wails of agony at having lost yet another election, come November. The fact of the matter is Middle America doesn’t much like you or your policies. But we most especially dislike your condescension.


―:☺:―

Related: “The Audacity of Defeat." Excerpt:


It’ll be far more acrimonious this time around if the GOP wins. Already mainstream commentators (on the liberal side) are preparing for the bitterness and reprisals with premature eulogies of Obama’s campaign. On Sept. 14, The Washington Post’s David Ignatius said, by choosing Palin, McCain had sold his soul to the devil to win the election. Richard Cohen, a colleague of Ignatius at the Post, implied that Obama was “too cool” to fight back against Palin’s “jibes, her sarcasm, her smug provincialism, her exploitation of mommyhood” and so on. The Times’ Paul Krugman, incredibly, wrote on Sept. 12 that McCain’s “lies” were worse than those of Karl Rove and Bush. “The Bush campaign’s lies in 2000 were artful—you needed some grasp of arithmetic to realize you were being conned.” Yet, according to Krugman, McCain’s campaign is so dishonest that should he and Palin win the White House, their administration would be “much, much worse” than Bush’s.


And you thought Bush Derangement Syndrome was bad, eh? Just wait. You ain't seen nuthin' yet! Heads are gonna explode, and lots of 'em, too.

(via Real Clear Politics)


―:☺:―

Kinda-sorta related… Didja see this?


It's time to dump Biden and replace him with Sen. Hillary Clinton. I don't care how it's done. Campaign chief David Axelrod can figure that out. And the sooner the better. Because I'm starting to think that if Team-Obama doesn't do something dramatic fast, it's gonna lose this election. There's a worrisome shift in momentum and in the polls. The Palin phenomenon, while truly unfathomable to Democrats (ed: See?), has energized McCain's campaign and allowed him like Houdini to snatch Obama's "change" theme right out from under him. It's time to snatch it back.


Conventional wisdom says replacing Biden with Clinton can't be done. That it's too late. That it'll make Obama appear indecisive, impulsive and lacking good judgement (sic). Many Democrats believe this would cause irreparable harm to the campaign, ringing Obama's death knell. But this couldn't be further from the truth. In fact, it'd be a freakin' coup for Obama, and would instantly melt Palin's undeserving outsize political ice cap.


[...]


Obama should do what the Republicans would do in this situation. In fact, he should do exactly what his opponent did. Shake things up. Be unconventional. Roll the dice. Out-McCain McCain. Who cares how it looks.


Oh, YES! Please, please DO!! What a capital idea!


[Pssst! Senator Obama! Over here!

This is really, really GOOD advice…and, trust me… you should take it! Seriously. Yes, I know this sounds strange coming from a McCain supporter, but really… I have your best interests at heart. I want to see you keep this thing close, ya know. We don’t wanna see any McGovern-like blow-outs, now, do we? That would be truly embarrassing and would… for all intents and purposes… end your brilliant political career just as it was beginning. Keep in mind: you’re a young man and 2012 ain’t that far away. Pick up that phone. Go on… call her. You know she wants to hear from you. It’s what’s best for the country the Party you, and Joe won’t mind. At all.]


(Snerk) (Smirf) gag… grwun… snork…
Bwah-wah-HA-HA-HA!

Oh shit, Oh Dear.

I can’t even
type this with a straight face.

17 comments:

  1. I’ve often been amazed at the liberal’s quickness to jump to name calling and fit throwing – the ones I know are an arrogant ilk. I think their treatment of Palin is proof of this. Biden was a bad choice to begin with – he is “old politics” at their best (or worst) – he is all that Obama has been campaigning against, yet he was their best choice? I, too, think they should switch to Hillary (insert evil laugh). She ain’t no Palin, and the people know it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would so LOVE to see a Palin-Hillary debate. Yow!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Democrats are in free-fall; every move they have made since McCain selected Palin has been an act of pure desperation.

    While they piss and moan that the Republicans have resorted to a sleazy campaign, they have busied themselves with slurs about a McCain's physical disabilities.

    Obama grew up, politically anyway, in the depths of the Chicago political machine. Dirty politics is all he knows. We can't expect any more than this from him.

    But we don't have to like it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Okay, I'll go first on this.

    I'm having a *real* problem with my mind's eye seeing Obama managing a save of his hindquarters by ditching Joe and replacing him with Hillary. It would end up being a beauty pageant between Clinton and Palin. Palin, with her pageant sash and her Tina Fey glasses.

    Obama's hole was too deep for a climb-out before he ever started his digging (although, as you point out, diggin' he is). No, this is one of those situations in politics where you just maintain status quo and wait for some serendipitous event.

    Keep an eye out for increasingly lame Palin stories. Next up -- she begged and pleaded with her parents to get her a puppy, and settled for a guinea pig. Do we need that kind of vascillating weak leadership in the White House?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lou sez: I’ve often been amazed at the liberal’s quickness to jump to name calling and fit throwing – the ones I know are an arrogant ilk.

    We must know some of the same people, Lou. I have two close friends of the Liberal persuasion and perhaps six acquaintances (maybe more) with Liberal views. My friends and I can discuss our differences... MOST of the time... without coming to virtual blows. But I can tell they get frustrated with me. I think it's all about that secular religion thing... they're RIGHT, I'm WRONG, and why the Hell can't you see that? It's morality, to them, and I'm "lacking" in that space. But that doesn't explain (fully) the Left's apparent NEED to demonize the opposition, now does it? Or maybe it does...

    Jim: "Yow" is right! People would pay good money to watch that, methinks.

    Kris sez: While they piss and moan that the Republicans have resorted to a sleazy campaign, they have busied themselves with slurs about a McCain's physical disabilities.

    I saw that Saturday and thought about posting on it. But football was MUCH more important, at the time.

    Morgan sez: I'm having a *real* problem with my mind's eye seeing Obama managing a save of his hindquarters by ditching Joe and replacing him with Hillary.

    I'm certain NO one in O's campaign... least of all The One hissownself.... is seriously considering this. Nope, it's just the over-wrought types who are pissing themselves in hysterical fits of pique. And there's not very many of those. There's LOTSA worry and fretting among the Donks, true... but only the hyper-emotional, seriously invested, BDS-afflicted shriekers are having serious panic attacks. Those isolated hissy-fits certainly are fun to watch, and even MORE fun to mock.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oh there is SO MUCH here to comment on!

    First of all, I really don't give a rip what the people in Europe think of us or our political process. Maybe when they get their own lame troubled countries in order, they can criticize the United States. Until then, who the hell cares about their usual arrogant opinions?

    I think I disagree that the Democrat tailspin began when McCain announced the Palin pick. I think it started the week before, during their convention. The PUMAs grabbed more attention than Obama, Obama's choice of the insider nutjob Biden, and then that ridiculous speech surrounded by the Greek columns (and not a very good speech either)...but mostly his decision to bypass Hillary as his running mate ... all started the tailspin. (And has anyone noticed that there are NO personal friends in Obama's past who come forward to vouch for him ...does he have any friends?) Then the next day McCain announced his pick of Palin, and it has been downhill for the Dems ever since.

    Needless to say ... I am loving all of it ... since I think if you base this race strictly on IDEAS and not on PERSONALITIES ... we beat them hands down.

    Did anyone see the latest Rasmussen poll numbers this morning? In five of the battleground states - Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, Virginia and Colorado -- the candidates are tied in two and McCain is leading in THREE. These states are MUST-WINS, and until this week, Obama had the advantage in all of them.

    There must be some people having nightmares over on the left these days.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sharon sez: Until then, who the hell cares about their usual arrogant opinions?

    I do, if only for another perspective, especially a serious and disinterested perspective. That automatically eliminates the asshats with the "you have a moral obligation to the rest of the The World to elect The One, coz it's The Right Thing To Do And You Know It." THOSE idjits can go piss up a rope.

    Intelligent commentary from folks who aren't as invested in the outcome (or are as close to the war as we are) is more than welcome, in my book. Which means, for the most part... "serious" media like The Times, The Telegraph, and FT (where the UK is concerned). Pundits from the Guardian, The Independent, et al need NOT apply. Around here, anyway.

    You make a good point about The One's speech at Invesco, Sharon. Long on tired ol' Leftie memes, short on anything of meaningful value. BAU, in other words.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I keep finding perfectly good reasons to use this one lately:

    If your team is losing, but you know you're the better team, you dig in and try harder and you fight like hell because you know you have what it takes to come out on top. If, however, your team is losing and you know it is because your team sucks, you whine and cry and try to take out the knee of the other team's star.

    This is what liberals know - how to goad the ref into calling the game in their favor. It has nothing to do with being (or even trying to be) the better team.

    And I have to agree with the pleasantness of hearing a good perspective from a foreign voice. As you mentioned, the left is tireless in it's chanting of how much the rest of the world hates us and we need to vote to satisfy the world's whim. Getting people from "the rest of the world" to dispute that flimsy claim exposes it as specious and only as strong an argument as the right's unwillingness to waste the time debunking it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I guess we disagree. Or maybe I have missed all the positive comments from serious Europeans. Seems to me like after we saved their necks in WWII, all they have done is bitch and bitch and bitch about the United States. All the while accepting help from us whenever they need it. And deserting us in the war on terror except for England and Italy. My opinion remains "who needs friends like this?" until I see some signs of real friendship from THEM.

    ReplyDelete
  10. One thing I've always noticed in my 59 years, including my years in the press/media.

    Democrats in general, Liberals in particular, are not the brightest bulbs in the box....Yes you may see an occasional one with an IQ above double digit, like some in my family, but for the most part...Just leave them alone, they will always screw it up, thus making things easier for the rest of us.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks for dropping by, Andy. I like your quote... in addition to the way ya think!

    Sharon sez: And deserting us in the war on terror except for England and Italy.

    I think we're in violent agreement here. All the sources I named in my original comment were British in origin. I have no use for your average, run-of-the-mill French, Dutch, German, or Nordic pundit. I also have an abiding love of most things British, except for the Labour twits who seem to running the country into the ground with their double-back-flip, fall all over themselves haste to jump on the PC bandwagon. But I think there's a backlash mounting in the UK over that. One hopes, anyway.

    I also have TREMENDOUS respect and admiration for the Poles, the Balts, and to a lesser extent the Czechs, Hungarians, Romanians, etc. The former Soviet satellites, in other words. I just find their opinions hard to read (i.e., not in English), when I find them at all. But these countries have been VERY supportive of the US and are among some of the finest allies we have. Not ALL Euroweenies are... well, weenies.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'll politely disagree, Pat. Most Liberals are too frickin' smart for their own good... witness The Academy. Or maybe they're too GOOD for their own good... as in impossibly idealistic. The world ain't all sweetness and light, and wishing will NOT make it so. But I know some damned smart Lefties, in the academic sense. Street-smarts is quite another story.

    Underestimate them at your peril, in other words.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Buck ~ I will agree with you on the Brits - for the present they still remain our allies, but they are allowing radical Muslims to take over their country, so I am not sure how long they will remain friendly to the Unites States.

    And I wasn't including the Eastern Europeans in my comments. I still have a hard time lumping them in with the traditional western Europeans, most of whom have not been friendly to the United States for a long long time. The Eastern Europeans have been good allies to the U.S.

    Good discussion!

    ReplyDelete
  14. You're the Astute one Buck...very well written and presented. I hope you get wide distribution on this one...more need to read it!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ah, but the fur is a'flyin'!

    It's going to be very interesting to see where all the dookie lands.

    Hell, I don't even smoke and I can totally see Obama's jonesing for a fag. t'hee!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Thanks, Mushy.

    Phlegmmy: Strange we've heard NO more about his success at quitting, eh? I'm with you... I most definitely can see him going up to two-plus packs a day. Stress, and all that. Speaking as an ex-smoker.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Yup. It's tasty, alright! Especially so after things like Vanity Fair calling GWB a dry drunk.

    Whatevs.

    ReplyDelete

Just be polite... that's all I ask.