From the (other) usual source...
No Space Shuttle for Air Force Museum: NASA Administrator Charles Bolden on Tuesday announced the museums where the four space shuttles will go on permanent display once the shuttle fleet retires later this year. The National Museum of the US Air Force in Dayton, Ohio, was not one of them. Instead, the Shuttle Atlantis will go to the Kennedy Space Center Visitor's Complex in Florida; Shuttle Discovery will reside at the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum's Udvar-Hazy Center in Virginia; Shuttle Endeavour will rest at the California Science Center in Los Angeles; and Shuttle Enterprise will relocate from the Udvar-Hazy Center to the Intrepid Sea, Air, and Space Museum in New York. NASA said the Air Force museum will receive some shuttle artifacts: the nose cap assembly and crew compartment trainer as well as orbital maneuvering system engines. Bolden's announcement coincided with the 30th anniversary of the first shuttle launch and 50th anniversary of manned space flight. (See also Air Force Museum release)
Well, that sucks. Just for grins and giggles, here's a couple o' items from the Air Force Museum's web site on the subject:
01) Why does the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force want a shuttle orbiter?Throughout the shuttle's flying career, the USAF has been an important NASA partner. In addition to contributing massive infrastructure and multifaceted operational support, the Air Force has provided NASA with many highly skilled shuttle astronauts. NASA and the Department of Defense began cooperating on space shuttle design in early 1969, and the USAF-NASA formal space shuttle relationship began on Feb. 17, 1970. Air Force satellite launch requirements largely determined shuttle design, and the Air Force saved the shuttle program in lean budget years during its development.
Recognizing this vital and historically significant partnership, the Secretary of the Air Force, in accordance with 40 U.S.C. §524(b)(2), has requested the interagency transfer of a shuttle orbiter to the Air Force's national historical collection. This acquisition is required in order to represent the USAF/NASA partnership and the contributions of the shuttle orbiter program to national defense.
Therefore, the National Museum of the United States Air Force and its governing body, the USAF Heritage Board of Directors, has identified the Air Force's space mission as its most important exhibit priority.04) Which shuttle orbiter is the museum requesting?The museum is open to receiving any available orbiter; however we are most interested in Atlantis due to it being the primary Air Force/Department of Defense shuttle. Atlantis is the orbiter that has flown five Department of Defense (DoD) dedicated missions, more than any other shuttle, and has also supported other DoD activities. The basic space shuttle design was heavily influenced by Air Force and DoD requirements, and Atlantis has included more than 30 Air Force astronauts among its crews. The Air Force and DoD also play critical roles in shuttle launch and recovery operations in a continuous, decades-long partnership with NASA.
NASA administrator Charles Bolden announced today the four museums -- the Smithsonian Institution (Discovery), the California Science Center (Endeavour), Kennedy Space Center (Atlantis) and the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum (Enterprise) -- that will receive space shuttles for public display after the fleet retires this summer.Me? I blame George Bush.
As expected Houston, the home of human spaceflight, was snubbed.
It's a shame. Houston's campaign, Bring the Shuttle Home, probably deserves some blame for being late to the game in terms of politicking for an orbiter.
But I'm not sure any campaign could have saved Houston. The politics of this decision were pretty clear. President Obama appoints the NASA administrator, and Texas is a decidedly Republican state.
Museum of Flight here in Seattle was gunning for it, too. It's a hell of a nice museum, I was hoping they'd get it. But those politics you mention just weren't to be overcome.
ReplyDeleteI'm surprised your mostly Blue congressional delegation couldn't wield some influence here, Andy. I neglected to mention that CA and NY had DICK to do with the Shuttle program, yet they managed to snag two of the four vehicles. That smacks of PURE politics, to me... especially where Houston is involved.
ReplyDeleteYeah, we're blue, and we have the old hatchetess Patty Murray on the Hill, but I get the feeling that Washington (State) doesn't carry a lot of weight in DC.
ReplyDeleteIt's really kinda hard to believe that one didn't end up in Houston. The Smithsonian is a given. Kennedy, too. But, New York? Okay, I'm sure it's a wonderful venue...but New York +/- Shuttle...ummmm.
ReplyDeleteI would have figured Houston maybe as much as a "given" as a resting place as Kennedy.
Who knows? Maybe they're looking at it from a potential "which area has more folks to look at it" deal.
Dammit, the older I get the more "generous" I am with giving out grace.
Bad call.
The AF has put more in to this project (at least in sweat equity).
Really bad call.
WV: spalunk Really. I'm sure there is something funny there, but I'm just too lame to see it.
New York! Now that is a bummer.
ReplyDeleteThis kind of politics stinks. No question, Houston should have one. Placing one in NY is about as ridiculous IMHO as putting one in the Country Music Hall of Fame/Museum (they could put it right next to one of Jerry Lee Lewis' pianos which also got burned a little during reentry).
ReplyDeleteDayton should have been number 1 on the list to get a shuttle. I am disappointed, but have to remind myself that it's all political.
ReplyDeleteYeah, New York really needs one!
L-Andy: Yeah, BAD move on the asshat NASA Administrator's part. Houston should definitely have gotten one.
ReplyDeleteLou: Yeah... I can't figger that one out? What did NYC have to do with the Shuttle?
Dan: Nice one about The Killer!
Ed: I think Houston should have been Number One, followed by Dayton.