Friday, January 02, 2009

I'm Still Buzzing

The Chicago Blackhawks, left and the Detroit Red Wings make their way onto the ice before the NHL Winter Classic held at Wrigley Field in Chicago, Thursday, Jan 1, 2009. (ANDRE JACKSON/DFP)
In the Mixed Metaphor Department… from ESPN:
CHICAGO -- Going, going, gone. Home run. Touch 'em all, NHL.
Forgive the obvious baseball allusion, but from the cool retro uniforms worn by the Detroit Red Wings and Chicago Blackhawks, to the 40,818 fans bundled up and jammed into venerable Wrigley Field belting out the national anthem en masse, to the old-style black fedoras sported by the Detroit coaching staff, to the wildly entertaining game itself, the 2009 Winter Classic was another red-letter day for the league.
For the second straight year, the NHL has taken its game outdoors, and this success at Wrigley virtually guarantees the Winter Classic will become an annual event and the National Hockey League will carve its own place on the sporting calendar with its Jan. 1 hockey lovefest.
Yup… what Mr. Burnside said. To say the Winter Classic was “wildly entertaining” is something of an understatement, as well. You had your home team staking a claim with a 3-1 lead at the end of the first period. You had the visitors storming into the lead with three unanswered goals in the second period. You had power play goals aplenty, a couple o' few entertaining scrums (but no fights) and at least one highlight reel goal that wowed the crowd, regardless of where their sympathies lay. The ice was good, the weather cooperative (for Chicago), and everyone was simply IN to the game… players, fans, and the media. Here are some highlights, courtesy of ESPN:

I think doing the Winter Classic as an annual event is a no-brainer, with certain reservations. The outdoor game obviously won’t fly in certain NHL cities, like Tampa, LA, San Jose, or wherever the Hell in Carolina it is the Hurricanes play. And there are some rather cryptic comments in Mr. Burnside’s article about the NHL not going to Canada for the Winter Classic… “for the time being.” What’s up with that? Toronto or Montreal would be “naturals,” IMHO… as both cities are home to Original Six teams and both are within easy driving distance of major NHL markets such as Boston, New York, and Detroit, among others. And the weather obviously wouldn’t be a problem in Calgary or Edmonton, although attendance might be light, as it takes a little doing to get to either of the latter cities.
As for me? I think the next Winter Classic should be played at Fenway… especially given the resurgent nature of the Bees. Fenway has all the “magic” of Wrigley Field in the historical sense and there are great rivalries to pick and choose from when selecting an opponent for the Bees. My second choice would be Yankee Stadium… for many of the same reasons I just cited, minus the history of the venue.


More Winter Classic hoopla here, here, and here…the last of which is one of those oh-so-very-cool 360-degree panorama shots of Wrigley Field, shot from the upper stands. View that photo full-screen and it’s almost like being there.

And finally... would that the Rose Bowl were as exciting as the Winter Classic. I marveled at the contrast between beautiful, sunny Pasadena and cold, windy Chicago (is this a great country, or what?) in the opening minutes of the Rose Bowl telecast and was MOST certainly wowed by the B-2 flyover. It was all downhill from there, tho. The best bits about the Rose Bowl were over before the game even began. I fell asleep at the half...

―::―

Just so you don’t think we’re all hockey, all the time…even though we most certainly ARE, come the playoffs… here’s some inter-tube goodness, via a Tweet from Lileks:

Shorpy.com | History in HD is a vintage photography blog featuring thousands of high-definition images from the 1850s to 1950s. The site is named after Shorpy Higginbotham, a teenage coal miner who lived 100 years ago.
And…
About the Photos
Most of the photos on this site were extracted from reference images (high-resolution tiffs, 20 to 200 megabytes in size) from the Library of Congress research archive. (To query the database click here.) Most were digitized by LOC contractors using a Sinar studio back. They are adjusted by your webmaster for contrast and color before being downsized and turned into the jpegs you see here.
This blog is SO good that Lileks is a mere contributor, even though I use the adjective “mere” advisedly. Note the first blurb above says “high-definition images.” If you don’t believe a 100-year old photo could qualify for that description, then you really need to go have a look at the site. Good stuff be there.

4 comments:

  1. The outdoor game obviously won’t fly in certain NHL cities, like... wherever the Hell in Carolina it is the Hurricanes play.

    Raleigh, NC - at the RBC Center, off Edwards Mill Road. :-)

    Yes, they would be on thin ice indeed trying to play hockey outdoors almost anywhere in North Carolina.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Raleigh, NC - at the RBC Center, off Edwards Mill Road. :-)

    I should have known that (except for the road bits), given as how I posted on them winning the Cup in 2006... and the fact I watched every game of that Cup Final. As I do every year, regardless of who's playing. ;-)

    Nice simile with the "thin ice" thing, Barry. (or metaphor, if that's correct. I always get 'em mixed up.)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sent my oldest friend in the world to this and your related links. He's a hockey nut, especially the Av's (or is that the Av?). With that, what about Mile High, or the new Mile High or whatever it's called. He'd be there so fast! (He has an Avalanche tattoo, fer gosh sake.)

    Me, I don't understand hockey that much (there are three halves!), but he and you are educating me. I really enjoyed watching the first one last year with him (slept over after New Years Eve). I'd go to one just for the atmosphere. NHL has a winner with this new tradition!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bob: Thanks for pointing your friend this way. I'm just a hair short of your buddy in the rabid-fan department... in that I don't have a Winged Wheel tat. I've thought about it, tho. Srsly. ;-)

    ReplyDelete

Just be polite... that's all I ask.