I learned a new word yesterday*: “Myrmidon.” As in:
1. Classical Mythology. one of the warlike people of ancient
2. (lowercase) a person who executes without question or scruple a master's commands.
Or… as in: “What the myrmidons of conventional wisdom just don't get about Palin.” Excerpt:
These folks lecture the rest of us about how to run the country; they are keepers of the conventional wisdom. And now, as the 2008 campaign enters the stretch run, we are about to see just how very much these folks know that is nonsense.
Take, for instance, the mantra of “change.” Having nominated Barack Obama and Joe Biden, respectively, for president and vice president — both prominent members of the most unpopular Congress in living memory — the Democratic wing of the political class chants incessantly about “change we can believe in.”
But it’s nothing less than a con job because the only change Obama and Biden offer is rhetorical. In terms of concrete policy proposals, what they offer is more government, more taxes, more regulation, more bureaucrats, more of everything that is wrong with
Peddling old liberal nostrums dressed up in new slogans works in a Democratic primary, but such moldy junk from the Great Society closet will turn off most of the rest of
There’s more at the link, and it’s very, very good. I think Mr. Tapscott put his finger on something most of us knew intuitively after doing our homework on young Mrs. Palin. She doesn’t fit the mold. She’s a politician, true, but she’s a politician in the time-honored tradition of the American “backwoods” politician… the kind one used to find in abundance in American political life but not so much these days, except perhaps on the local level. And this is a good thing, to my way of thinking. I firmly believe the rest of
I know people don’t vote for the vice-presidential candidate… they vote for the guy at the top of the ticket. But, in this case the Number Two is generating such positive vibes in the Republican Party… and has such a wonderful story to tell… that she’s burnishing the image of Number One simply by association. And the uncommitted middle can’t help but notice. Hell, it’s been “All Sarah, All the Time” ever since Friday. Only Gustav had the power to knock Mrs. Palin off the front pages and off the cable news channels, and that’s saying something, Gentle Reader.
I believe substance will ultimately transcend form. We… the fortunate few on the Right… seemingly have substance in spades. As opposed to, ya know… Hopeychange. Be Afraid, Democrats. Be VERY afraid.
* Yes, I did read The Iliad. Long ago and far away, however. About 50 years ago, give or take a month or three. Time fades away.
―:☺:―
So… Glen Greenwald has his panties in a twist over this: “Scenes from St. Paul -- Democracy Now's Amy Goodman arrested.” Excerpt:
Following up on this weekend's extreme raids on various homes, at least 50 people were arrested here today in
Perhaps most extraordinarily, Amy Goodman of Democracy Now -- the radio and TV broadcaster who has been a working journalist for close to 20 years -- was arrested on the street and charged with "conspiracy to riot."
Well, dang. Squads of cops “marching in military formations”… how absolutely Brown-Shirt of them, eh? No word on how they got the Humvees up on those buildings and balconies, however. That would have been news I could use. Nope…it’s all about Ms. Goodman, one of the Left’s absolute darlings. But, Hey! She was arrested!!1!! You don’t suppose that might have had something/anything to do with this, would ya?
ST. PAUL, Minn. – Protesters attacked delegates, smashed windows, punctured car tires and threw bottles Monday, a violent counterpoint to an otherwise peaceful anti-war march at the Republican National Convention. Police wielding pepper spray arrested at least 56 people.
The trouble happened not far from the
[…]
Members of the
One 80-year-old member of the delegation had to be treated for injuries, and several other delegates had to rinse their eyes and clothing, the station reported.
So, now. Let me get this straight. An 80 year-old member of the Connecticut RNC delegation was treated for injuries inflicted by a mob of “peaceful protesters” and Amy Goodman was arrested… and released three hours later? Dang. Greenwald is right. What a frickin’ outrage.
It seems that anti-war people are not always peaceful. People like that will now attack Palin any way they can - her children will not be spared. It puts a dim light on the Dimocrits.
ReplyDeleteI have to admit I had some reservations about the veep pick when I first heard. Mind you, I was camping all weekend with no cell service or news and couldn't do any research til I got home. But after a couple of days to consider how wise a pick it really was, I think he made a good choice. I hope the children, especially the oldest girl, come out of this ok. You have to hand it to her that she isn't trying to cover anything up.
ReplyDeleteAs for the riots: figures. Seems very childish and a low blow. And of course it seems the MSM isn't hardly mentioning it at all.
Thanks for enriching my vocabulary, Buck. I can't wait to tell some stiff that he's a myrmidon, then watch the puzzlement cross his/her face...
ReplyDeleteThe main street press or main stream, whatever the Hell they want to be called, and the far left loons at Daily Kos, Huffington and other blogs will do the worst to destroy Palin.
ReplyDeleteI think she has the stuff to hang in there, but when your family is taking cheap shots, it's tough....and we all know that's what "peace loving" libs do, take cheap shots, they are the world's trash.
What I find remarkable is the idea that McCain thinks he might be able to win over the Hillary supporters. Um ... hello ... Palin is ANTI-choice. I cannot imagine a Hillary supporter worth her (or his) salt voting for McCain based on his choice of Palin.
ReplyDeleteI think Palin is a strong choice for V.P. IF the Presidential nominee wasn't John McCain. I'm paraphrasing the NY Times editorial today, don't remember the author... but he made a great case for McCain doing exactly what he said he would do: pick someone with similar policies and viewpoints. The danger here is that the VP doesn't compliment McCain the way a VP should.
ReplyDeleteIn my (limited) positions of leadership over the years, I have always appreciated the different points of view my staff had; it kept me out of trouble and provided a more balanced input and feedback.
Hi Buck... I like McCains choice. I've been listening in at the water cooler here at work, where the left outweighs the right. On of those comments: "Sure seems stupid to have her on the ticket when the Republicans are all about family values and morals and she's got a pregnant unmarried teen." (I had to bite my tongue, sit on my hands, hold my breath... I don't discuss politics at work). Anyhow, I like her... what do you think about the lobbyist issue between her using one and McCains dislike of them? (Just another overheard comment...heh)
ReplyDeleteThe problem with politics in general is that it is hard to tell when a politician is really working for You the citizen/taxpayer. Now some of you know a little of my history, the prodigal son of the Land of Enchantment lost in the East (that’s “Back East” to you). I was once, for a time of 7 years (more if you can add in the misery index with this kind of work) a real life “elected official”. A Town Supervisor, a kind of Councilman or County Selectmen or Supervisor. The town I live in had 5 Supervisors, all elected at large (meaning none of us Supervisors were assigned or elected from any one particular area of the town). I was elected mainly because no one knew me, I was new on the scene and I had done a lot of volunteer work for the township, and the guy I was replacing was well, let’s say controversial.
ReplyDeleteDuring this tenure I took the position that I was a Supervisor of everyone in the Township, Republicans, Democrats, Socialist/Commies (yes we have them) and the Independents. I even decided that I would represent the Non-Voter as well and yes, we have a bunch of them as well. I felt that any decision I was making had to be right for Everyone, not just a special interest be that a Group or an Individual.
Now, not to drag this out too much but I put my heart and soul into this “Part-time” job. It was one of those un-requited love affairs, lots of blood, sweat and tears. It was a lot of time away from home attending meetings, going out to inspect roads, bridges, culverts, mail boxes (knocked down by snow plows). Planning bike trails, parks and sewer plants. Defending the community from other predatory government agency’s (the PA department of environmental protection was famous for its Nazi interpretation of legislative rules) and from those villainous developers with more money for Lawyers than we had in total tax revenue. Fighting with other elected officials, laying off Police Officers (never popular) and firing township employees (and this is worse yet if that individual is a party official). Making purchasing decisions from Ethernet Networks to 37 thousand pound dump trucks, picking out trees to plant at a park to interviewing new volunteers. To be completely open, this was a paid position and the entire $1500.00 (pre-tax) per year was welcome (and yes, that is 1500, not thousand), but let’s just say, in my final two years in office it did not cover the millage I put on my own vehicle running around for the Township. Yeah, it was loads of fun.
The biggest problem with the attitude I had is that it tends to piss-off the ones who really control the power in any elected government. That is, the Party Leadership. These are the people that are not elected to any position save “District Party Leader” (or Boss as it were) and this ‘election’ is not done in public, it is done behind a closed door and these ‘voters’ are invited to participate in this ‘election’. Now a lot of you will think that this only applies to small town government but I truly believe that this works all the way up the chain. I mean, how powerful was Carl Rove? And what election did he run in? Anyone vote for him? And who in his right mind would keep Howard Dean in his current job if it were not for some kind of secret deal?
Now, when my time came to run for re-election (we have 6-year terms) I was NOT the Party favorite. Despite 6 long years of hard work, dispassionate decision making and many long meetings representing the citizens of the 22 square miles of my little town, I was opposed by a pick by the Party Machine. It was a rough primary, lots of lies and vandalism directed at Me. Party flyers mass mailed to everyone in town and lots of volunteers brought in from outside the community to work the Poles. Needless to say, I lost. I can’t tell you how many people have come up to me in and around our fair town to say how bad they feel for me losing that election, for me not being in office doing their work. Even just recently someone commented on how corrupt the Board has gotten since I left office, and its been 8-years!!!
Moral of the Story – if you are going to be working in the kitchen, expect to break some eggs, spill the flour and splash some milk around. In politics, the more people in the party are mad at you, the better you are doing your Job for the People. This is what I like about McCain past even all that other stuff, you know, the Navy attack pilot (yeah, he flew A-4’s, ‘scooters’ not fighters), POW that was tortured and broken by the Enemy, the ‘Maverick ‘ we all have heard about. The Party as a whole, back in April and May hated McCain; they tried to black ball and bury him. Even Mitt Romney was looking good to them back in May. Contrast that with BO or Joe “Smoe” Bidden. Now there are two people that are doing the Party’s bidding and not getting anyone mad. Hell, BO himself has not been if office long enough to garner any leverage so he owes favors all over the place. And his running mate Joe, well all I have to say is 36 years!! That’s right; he has been in this one job for 36 years working real hard not to make anyone mad at him so he can keep that Job. And what do we have to show for his long tenure – absolutely nothing. Compare that to McCain; I don’t know of any “Bidden – Kennedy” bill, or a “Bidden – Fiengold” bill and thank god for them small favors cause you know they would be toxic to human life or at least tax money.
Now, this is all good from my perspective because the more the Party holds it nose over a candidate the better that candidate is for the People. Now add a little “Sarah” to that recipe. Who did she go after? None other than the State Party Chairman of her very own party. I would pull the lever for that Woman on no other grounds than that. Yep, McCain comes with few items we all have to choke back but he is his own Man and so is Sarah (metaphorically speaking that is). Their success will be pretty much on their own terms, not the Party’s and that is good for all of us.
The police seem not to care that generally speaking these protests are peaceful until a small minority of anarchidiots come along and start breaking windows, setting fires, and assaulting people. The police see this and then start aggressively "restoring order," catching up the peaceful types in the middle.
ReplyDeleteOf course, the increased militarization of police certainly hasn't helped things. You start dressing and equipping like the military and you are more likely to begin acting like them.
Oh, and Greenwald is an idiot...this has nothing to do with the Republicans and everything to do with the police culture in this country. The EXACT same thing has happened at the DNC the past couple times, including this year. Besides, never attribute to malice that which can be attributed to incompetence.
Lou: I agree with your points... especially about the attacks on Palin. There's a lil bit of hypocrisy at work here... on the one hand we have Obama and Biden tut-tutting about kids being off limits while their campaign staffers dig feverishly for dirt and then disseminate it. This is Change?
ReplyDeleteJenny: Dang... three days away from the news and stuff -- I'm envious! How was your camping trip? I'm assuming you're gonna post?
Jim: As I said recently: We're ALL about public service! ;-)
Lori sez: I cannot imagine a Hillary supporter worth her (or his) salt voting for McCain based on his choice of Palin.
Well, you have a point -- for about half of Hillary's base, give or take a percentage points. I wouldn't expect the more vociferous proponents of "choice"... the "single issue" voters... to sign up for McCain, no matter WHO his running mate might be. But... I've read that Her Hillaryness has a lot of Blue Dog Democrat supporters, the working class, blue-collar types who gave her her victories in PA, Ohio, and such. I believe those are the people McCain/Palin are targeting.
Sam (SN2) sez: The danger here is that the VP doesn't compliment McCain the way a VP should.
In my (limited) positions of leadership over the years, I have always appreciated the different points of view my staff had; it kept me out of trouble and provided a more balanced input and feedback
I have experience similar to yours, too. But there's a critical difference between differences in approach, POVs, and values and principles. I tend to evaluate people based upon their character, rather than how they choose to solve a particular problem. It's kinda-sorta similar to the "honor code" we live by in the military, to over-simplify the point. So, to get back to the original point, McCain chose someone who's underlying values mirror his. At least I prefer to believe that.
Alison sez: what do you think about the lobbyist issue between her using one and McCains dislike of them?
This is tricky, innit? On the one hand, I believe lobbyists serve an important purpose: representing a particular group of people unified for a purpose and assisting them in articulating their POVs to a legislative body. The NRA, various labor unions, and the frickin' trial lawyers come to mind. OTOH, there's a bright line between legitimate advocacy and the outright purchase of a politician, a la that other Navy fighter pilot... Duke Cunningham. He crossed that line, he knew it, and he's paying the price. I don't see anything wrong with what Palin did as mayor; that was her job. We can discuss methods and procedures all day and the perceived ethical issues involved, but the bottom line is she did nothing illegal as mayor. That we know.
Jimmy: Thanks for telling your story. You sound EXACTLY like the sort of elected official I was talking about when I used the term "backwoods politician." Your points about how our system is structured are well taken, and I, too, have a lot of respect for Mrs. Palin for taking on her party's Good Ol Boy network. I think that particular quality of hers complements McCain quite well.
Mike sez: The police seem not to care that generally speaking these protests are peaceful until a small minority of anarchidiots come along and start breaking windows, setting fires, and assaulting people. The police see this and then start aggressively "restoring order," catching up the peaceful types in the middle.
And that's as it should be, right? As long as you're peaceful, the police don't care. It's only when things get out of hand that the police actually act. As far as "innocents" getting caught in the middle... I'm reminded of what Mom always said: "choose the company you keep carefully." Some of the "peaceful" types are more innocent than others.
The militarization of the police is a tricky subject. In a perfect world, there should be a line between what the cops do, and what the National Guard does. I'm thinking there's a timing issue here... police SWAT teams and the like can respond immediately to civil unrest, read as "riots," while it takes a significant amount of time to mobilize and deploy the Guard. This is an issue that merits LOTS of debate.
Your last sentence is MOST appropriate!!
"And that's as it should be, right? As long as you're peaceful, the police don't care. It's only when things get out of hand that the police actually act. As far as "innocents" getting caught in the middle... I'm reminded of what Mom always said: "choose the company you keep carefully." Some of the "peaceful" types are more innocent than others."
ReplyDeleteYes and no. The problem comes when the police respond to a few isolated incidents of violence with tear gassing the whole mass and beating the crap out of anyone they can get their hands on, a la '68 DNC. There's also the issue that, per SOP the past few years for conventions, the police preemptively raided buildings that were being used to plan protests. There's something inherently un-American about using a SWAT team armed with automatic weapons to raid a building whose occupants have only committed the "crime" of planning to protest.
Re: the militarization of police, I agree that SWAT teams and riot police have a place in the arsenal of tools that a large city's police department should have. The problem I have with it is that too often these resources are used preemptively as a chilling effect as opposed to being used to respond legitimately to riots, acts of violence, etc., to say nothing of the overuse of SWAT teams in fighting the war on (some) drugs (which is a whole 'nother issue).
I guess I come down on the side that a little unrest is more than worth it to preserve our free society. Ultimately, I think we've drifted so far in the other direction that what would be perceived as an "extreme" shift in the other direction really wouldn't be extreme at all.
Don't get me wrong, all the protesters are a bunch of morons. Sitting on my ass at home watching South Park would be a far better use of time than protesting. Still, the principle of it is what's important.
ReplyDeleteKind of like how one of the reasons I'm in the military is so people can burn the flag...I think that if you do that, you're outing yourself as a complete jackass, but you should still be able to do it.
There's something inherently un-American about using a SWAT team armed with automatic weapons to raid a building whose occupants have only committed the "crime" of planning to protest.
ReplyDeleteI MOST DEFINITELY agree with you here. On the surface. OTOH, I've also read the cops came upon buckets of feces and urine that were gonna be used in said "protests." I'm not sure we... the public... know everything the cops knew before they executed those raids. As I said: this is a subject that merits lots of debate and discussion.
I guess I come down on the side that a little unrest is more than worth it to preserve our free society.
And once again: we're in agreement. I remember the '68 DNC pretty danged well, and I was outraged and shocked at the Chicago police's over-reaction. But then again, I was a moonbat back then, as well, so "outrage" was SOP for me. Except it was justified in that particular case.
As for your follow-on clarification... I'm not taking you wrong at all, Mike. Our respective POVs are very close in this space.
It is definitely a tough line to walk...I guess I'm jaded to the point where I almost automatically assume the worst when a story like this involving law enforcement comes up.
ReplyDeleteWhich is too bad, but is also a sign of their past performance (or lack thereof).