Monday, March 31, 2008

Out Like a Lamb?

It’s the wind, Gentle Reader…the ever-present, dust-laden, annoying, wear-you-down-to-a-nub wind. That said, yesterday was brilliant. We nearly hit 85 degrees and the wind was down to a manageable “steady 10 ~ 15 mph, with gusts of 20 mph.”
Not so today. Ah, Spring!
―:☺:―
The lady doth think too much, methinks:
We’ve all been there. Or some of us have. Anyone who cares about books has at some point confronted the Pushkin problem: when a missed — or misguided — literary reference makes it chillingly clear that a romance is going nowhere fast. At least since Dante’s Paolo and Francesca fell in love over tales of Lancelot, literary taste has been a good shorthand for gauging compatibility. These days, thanks to social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace, listing your favorite books and authors is a crucial, if risky, part of self-branding. When it comes to online dating, even casual references can turn into deal breakers. Sussing out a date’s taste in books is “actually a pretty good way — as a sort of first pass — of getting a sense of someone,” said Anna Fels, a Manhattan psychiatrist and the author of “Necessary Dreams: Ambition in Women’s Changing Lives.” “It’s a bit of a Rorschach test.” To Fels (who happens to be married to the literary publisher and writer James Atlas), reading habits can be a rough indicator of other qualities. “It tells something about ... their level of intellectual curiosity, what their style is,” Fels said. “It speaks to class, educational level.”
Pity the would-be Romeo who earnestly confesses middlebrow tastes: sometimes, it’s the Howard Roark problem as much as the Pushkin one. “I did have to break up with one guy because he was very keen on Ayn Rand,” said Laura Miller, a book critic for Salon. “He was sweet and incredibly decent despite all the grandiosely heartless ‘philosophy’ he espoused, but it wasn’t even the ideology that did it. I just thought Rand was a hilariously bad writer, and past a certain point I couldn’t hide my amusement.” (Members of theatlasphere.com, a dating and fan site for devotees of “Atlas Shrugged” and “The Fountainhead,” might disagree.)
But things are different on the Upper West Side, no? I’m probably revealing much more about my pedestrian reading habits than I should… but I’ve never had a woman complain about my reading tastes. That factoid may or may not say something/anything about me and the women I’ve dated or been in relationships with. Then again, I don’t hang out in the salons of NYC, so all bets are off. But wait! Is there a bit of sense in this screed?
Let’s face it — this may be a gender issue. Brainy women are probably more sensitive to literary deal breakers than are brainy men. (Rare is the guy who’d throw a pretty girl out of bed for revealing her imperfect taste in books.) After all, women read more, especially when it comes to fiction. “It’s really great if you find a guy that reads, period,” said Beverly West, an author of “Bibliotherapy: The Girl’s Guide to Books for Every Phase of Our Lives.” Jessa Crispin, a blogger at the literary site Bookslut.com, agrees. “Most of my friends and men in my life are nonreaders,” she said, but “now that you mention it, if I went over to a man’s house and there were those books about life’s lessons learned from dogs, I would probably keep my clothes on.”
Umm… nope.
Still, to some reading men, literary taste does matter. “I’ve broken up with girls saying, ‘She doesn’t read, we had nothing to talk about,’” said Christian Lorentzen, an editor at Harper’s. Lorentzen recalls giving one girlfriend Nabokov’s “Ada” — since it’s “funny and long and very heterosexual, even though I guess incest is at its core.” The relationship didn’t last, but now, he added, “I think it’s on her Friendster profile as her favorite book.”
Even though I’ve excerpted the article heavily, it’s still a good read. Even if the only thing you take away is “Thank God I’ve never met any of these women.” (or men)
―:☺:―
Speaking of books… the blogger who writes “Stuff White People Like” has reportedly signed a book deal for $300K. See what happens when you get a million and half hits in only three months of blogging? What’s that? Envy? Me? G’wan…
―:☺:―
Something good… for a change… from Inside the Beltway: A slide-show of WaPo readers’ cherry blossom pics (Slide #13 is just too cool, btw). Coz it’s that time of year, Gentle Reader.
Speaking of cherry blossoms… here’s a couple of pics of the cherry tree outside my door in full bloom, taken on March 18th of last year. The tree has yet to bloom this year even though it’s pretty well leafed-out. Well, I count four blossoms on the tree, just by looking out the window. But that’s nothing, compared to previous years. Makes me wonder, it does.
―:☺:―
Mr. Hockey is 80 years old today. And still going to Red Wings games, and still signing autographs for the legions of his fans. Wow. Here are 32 facts about the man who spent 32 seasons in the NHL. Much more at MLive, including this:
As for the specifics of Howe's birthday party:
March 30, Associated Press: The Detroit Red Wings celebrated Gordie Howe's 80th birthday with a ceremony before Sunday's game against the Nashville Predators.
Howe, who actually turns 80 on Monday, was presented with a framed No. 17 jersey -- his number his rookie year before he got No. 9 his second season. He also was presented with a leather jacket; part of his bonus when he signed was a leather Red Wings jacket.
Christopher Ilitch, the son of team owner Mike Ilitch, announced via a taped message that the team was also giving Howe a 48-inch high-definition television.
"I've been treated like an angel and I don't know where they got it," said Howe after the ceremony.
The party continued after Howe participated in a ceremonial puck drop:
March 30, DetroitRedWings.com: Minutes after the presentation, National Anthem singer Karen Newman, along with the fans, serenaded Howe with a rendition of "Happy Birthday."
A special birthday cake -- in the shape of a white No. 9 -- was presented, the likes of which have not been seen at Joe Louis Arena.

"The cake measures seven-feet long, three-feet wide," said chef Mike Berend. "It is actually composed of 27 individual sheet cakes put together. It was made with a case of eggs (about 10 dozen), 100 pounds of flour and 50 pounds of sugar. This is the largest cake I've had to make in 14 years of working here."
The cake was shared with Howe as well as 1,200 fans in the Olympia Club and on the suite level.
Happy Birthday, Gordie!
(photo: Getty Images, via The Hockey News)

16 comments:

  1. Heck, I'd be happy if I found a man who reads. Anything. Anything at all--except porn and more than just newspapers and cereal boxes. I know, I know, go hang out in the library. Our stupid local library closes at 5:30.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think the reason for few blooms on the cherry tree is the dang wind blew them off before anyone could see them.

    I don't think I would care what a guy read as long as he was reading and not just "looking at the pictures." I like to read most anything and will try anything that someone suggests with good reasons. I think these picky women have missed some good guys all because of their tastes in books - silly.

    Happy Birthday to Howie! He looks pretty good for 80! I wonder what he reads?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Becky sez: Heck, I'd be happy if I found a man who reads. Anything. Anything at all--except porn and more than just newspapers and cereal boxes.

    What? You can read porn? And here I thought it was just a visual medium... ;-)

    Just kidding, of course... and just curious: How do you define written porn, Becky?

    Lou sez: I don't think I would care what a guy read as long as he was reading and not just "looking at the pictures." I like to read most anything and will try anything that someone suggests with good reasons. I think these picky women have missed some good guys all because of their tastes in books - silly.

    Happy Birthday to Howie! He looks pretty good for 80! I wonder what he reads?


    Agreed on that, Lou. I wonder if the current generation will be so picky? A lot of kids I know only read when they HAVE to, which is very, very sad... not to mention alarming.

    And I'll bet Gordie reads The Hockey News...;-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, you know, Buck, I've heard men say they don't look at the pictures. They just read those magazines for the articles.

    Written porn for women= romance novels.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Hubby was not a reader when I married him. I was - still am - a voracious reader. Eventually he couldn't resist trying out a book I raved about - The Firm by John Grisham.

    He's been hooked ever since; has even read Atlas Shrugged.

    And what is WRONG with those women! Atlas Shrugged is one of the finest books ever written.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "What? You can read porn? And here I thought it was just a visual medium... ;-)

    Just kidding, of course... and just curious: How do you define written porn, Becky?"

    Funny you should mention that...last week we were getting a briefing from a JAG out of Offutt about ethical behavior as defined by DoD. He was making a point about misuse of government resources and one of the examples on the slides was using a government computer to read porn, to which he raised the question how exactly does one "read" porn. None of us had a satisfactory answer.

    As for the reading and guy/girl thing, maybe it's just the crowd I run with but I know several more guys that read on a regular basis than girls. Moreover, the guys are usually reading stuff that matters, like quality fiction or non fiction relevant to some sort of current event, whereas the females are generally reading crappy pointless fiction.

    If I could find a woman I could debate IR theory with, I'd be set. Chances of that happening at ISU...between slim and none, and slim just left town (to be a corn farmer, no less.)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Becky sez: Well, you know, Buck, I've heard men say they don't look at the pictures. They just read those magazines for the articles.

    Written porn for women= romance novels.


    That was a serious question I asked, btw. So... I'm taking it that you think magazines like Penthouse, Playboy, FHM, and the like are porn? I'm not sure I agree... well, I don't agree; no sense in being wishy-washy. Defining porn is hard, as Justice Potter Stewart, in attempting to classify what material constituted exactly "what is obscene", famously wrote, "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced . . . [b]ut I know it when I see it."

    Agreed on the romance novels, in spades. I once had a female room mate who collected Harlequin romance novels, and consumed them in mind-boggling quantities... like reading 20 or more over the course of a weekend. Her mom sent her boxes stuffed full of the things.

    Kris sez: He's been hooked ever since; has even read Atlas Shrugged.

    And what is WRONG with those women! Atlas Shrugged is one of the finest books ever written.


    Good for the Hubby, Kris! I gotta disagree with you on "Atlas." I've tried to read it at least three times and have never made it beyond the first 100 pages. I find Rand's prose lumbering, stilted, and generally lacking in grace. I do agree with her politics, for the most part, though.

    Mike sez: Funny you should mention that...last week we were getting a briefing from a JAG out of Offutt ... raised the question how exactly does one "read" porn. None of us had a satisfactory answer.

    Interesting, that, and I assume the JAG didn't have an answer, either?

    As for the reading and guy/girl thing, maybe it's just the crowd I run with but I know several more guys that read on a regular basis than girls. Moreover, the guys are usually reading stuff that matters, like quality fiction or non fiction relevant to some sort of current event, whereas the females are generally reading crappy pointless fiction.

    If I could find a woman I could debate IR theory with, I'd be set.


    It might be the crowd you run with, and it might further be an age thing... but, as we all know: it's dangerous to generalize.

    As for finding a woman with whom to debate IR Theory... at ISU or otherwise ... Good Luck! IR Theory is hard, and debating it might be counter-productive to your sex life, assuming you're looking for a woman as both mate and intellectual companion. (I'm assuming she'd hold a different view than yours, given that's what debate is all about... I won't flog this subject, though.)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Our final March day was a blow out...but not like a lamb. We did reach 60, with a 40 MPH and higher wind....today the wind is sticking around, but the temp as dropped quicker than Monica in the Oval Office.....40 and still going down!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Seem only last week Gordy retired....wait, it was only last week!

    ;)

    The guy played forever, and at a high level....they don't make em' like that these days.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Compatibility in a relationship is a weird thing. When my wife and I first met, we bonded (among other things) over our shared admiration for the author Robertson Davies... but, hell, we were both English majors, so that's the kind of thing we would talk about anyway.

    One thing I've noticed is that most people can reel off a fairly comprehensive and discrete list of "turn-offs" - things that they would actively dislike in a potential mate... but they tend to get much more vague and abstract if you ask them what they're looking for or what they really *want* in a mate.

    Funny, that.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Pat sez: The guy played forever, and at a high level....they don't make em' like that these days.

    True, Pat. I thought oh-so-briefly about pulling Blog-Bud Becky's chain by asking her to name me ONE NFL player who played half as many seasons as Gordie. Can't be done.

    Barry sez: One thing I've noticed is that most people can reel off a fairly comprehensive and discrete list of "turn-offs" - things that they would actively dislike in a potential mate... but they tend to get much more vague and abstract if you ask them what they're looking for or what they really *want* in a mate.

    Funny, that.


    Heh. I can do that without even thinking (like I do with most things in my life, but I digress). My father first told me that ol' joke about what men want in a woman, to wit:

    I wanted a lady in the drawing room, a witch in the kitchen, and a slut in the bedroom.

    The punchline, of course, is:

    But what I got was a lady in the bedroom, a slut in the drawing room, and she doesn't have the slightest idea where the kitchen is...

    I'm sorta like that when it comes to what I want in a woman. There's more of course. The qualities above are the minimum requirements.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Unless Gordy played for more than 40 years, I can name one. Vinnie Testaverde retired at the end of the 2997 season after playing for 20 years. But you're right. Most football players don't last but around 12-15 years. Football is just too hard on the player's body. Maybe if all they had to do was skate around in circles, they'd last longer. Like Mike Ditka said, "Football is not a contact sport. It's a collision sport." Rough, violent, a real man's game.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Becky sez: Maybe if all they had to do was skate around in circles, they'd last longer. Like Mike Ditka said, "Football is not a contact sport. It's a collision sport." Rough, violent, a real man's game.

    Spoken like someone who certainly doesn't know her nether regions from her elbow, vis-a-vis hockey. Consider:

    Let's face it, out of all the real sports these two require the most physical skill. In football, linemen have to be powerhouses, yet remain graceful enough to stay light on their feet. Receivers have to possess physical strength, soft hands, and the ability to hold onto the ball during the frequent times they get drilled while going across the middle. Oh yeah, and then there are those one-handed catches while trying to get both feet inbounds. I still don't know how they can instantly quit the running motion in time to drag a foot before they cross a sideline. Football requires endurance, the ability to fight through pain, tremendous power, and grace. Hockey, on the other hand requires all that and more. Take all the skills necessary to play football and turn the grass to ice. Reduce the body's contact with the ground from a pair of flexible feet that can grip the field to two thins blades of metal that don't bend, don't adjust, and don't offer much balance. Turn a football into a hard disc that flies around at speeds over 100 mph. Now try to control a puck and head towards the goal while the defender can pretty much do anything he wants to stop you. Remember, receivers can't really be messed with after five yards. Hockey players can mess with you almost anytime. And, if you're thinking about playing hockey, you might want to take a boxing class or two. EDGE: hockey.

    You can read the rest of "hockey vs. football" here .

    ReplyDelete
  14. Fact: hockey and football are the two greatest sports ever invented.

    As soon as I read this opening sentence, I knew the article would be biased. No need to read further. But read I did. I wondered how in all those paragraphs, he gave football the edge or the sports were even, yet at the end, he said hockey was the better sport. I counted. In two paragraphs, he gave the sports an even rating. In two paragraphs, he gave football the edge. In two paragraphs, he gave hockey the edge. Yet he gave hockey the overall better sport. Hmmm

    Then I read this:

    when football ends, a glorious hockey season is in full swing and heating up.

    Yeah, I knew this was not an objectively written article. You could find someone in any one of the 40.5 million MORE households that watched the Superbowl than watched the hockey championships, and they could write a similar article with completely different results.

    Find me an objective, verifiable article showing how hockey is better and I'll concede the point. But I'll still think the game is boring.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Fact: hockey and football are the two greatest sports ever invented.

    As soon as I read this opening sentence, I knew the article would be biased. No need to read further. But read I did.


    Why is that sentence biased? It may be opinion, but it doesn't reflect any bias, inasmuch as the writer paired two essentially non-equivalent sports. And as far as the writer's conclusion go... he gave his opinion, based upon his analysis.

    Find me an objective, verifiable article showing how hockey is better and I'll concede the point. But I'll still think the game is boring.

    There's no such thing as "an objective, verifiable article" when one compares apples and oranges. I'll give you this, though: The NHL has been around a LOT longer than the NFL, its traditions are richer, and its trophy (the Stanley Cup) is legendary and unique in all sport. How many people in Russia, Sweden, or the Czech Republic would recognize the Lombardi trophy (I had to google the frickin' name, it's that unfamiliar...) if they saw it? Hardly anyone, perhaps NO one. Yet the Stanley Cup drew HUNDREDS of thousands when it made its' stops in the countries I mentioned... just three among the many countries the Cup has visited. Indisputable, that.

    "Boring" is like Beauty, Becky... eye of the beholder, and all that. I'll not invoke the "only boring people are bored" cliché. Ooops.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Well, I guarantee if you put me in front of a hockey game, I'll be boring. Unless you find watching people snore vastly interesting....

    ReplyDelete

Just be polite... that's all I ask.