I tuned in just as the Senate Foreign Relations committee hearings were ending, sometime in the early afternoon, my time. Strangely enough, the Armed Services committee meeting was scheduled to begin a mere five minutes after the Foreign Relations meeting ended. Senator Levin was generous by delaying the start of his meeting by 20 minutes, giving General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker a few minutes to grab a sandwich or other such sustenance. Then it was on with the show.
As I stated at the beginning: I watched the whole miserable, trying thing. It was interminable, and I say this as a guy who was free to get up and walk around, go to the loo, get a Dr. Pepper out of the fridge, fix a snack, or whatever else struck my fancy. Ambassador Crocker and General Petraeus weren’t as lucky: they got one 20 minute break during the whole ordeal, if memory serves. Only one break in a hearing that lasted at least four hours, not counting the previous day’s inquisition or the previous Foreign Relations hearing? Now that’s cruel and unusual punishment. One Armed Services committee member recognized this fact and opened his questioning with a quip that back-to-back hearings lasting well over eight hours “might not be
For your benefit Gentle Reader, I offer the following “Shorter Senate Armed Services Committee Hearing:”
Petraeus/Crocker: “It’s working. We need more time. We don’t need deadlines. We DO need continued funding.”
Republicans: “Yes, we know it’s working.”
Democrats: “No, it’s NOT.” “The American people…blah, blah, blah.”
I threw away at least six hours of my life yesterday watching that kabuki play. I really should have known better at my age.
One more note. Aside from General Petraeus, the most impressive person in those hearings yesterday was Senator Clinton. You cannot possibly understand how much it pains me to write that, but it’s absolutely true. The woman was calm, cool, organized, and made her points with great precision and gravitas. In a word, she looked …um… “presidential.” It pains me to write that, too.
Didn't get a chance to watch the Senate testimony. Didn't much want to, either. As bad as Rep. Wexler was Monday, I am fairly certain that the Senate hearings were worse.
ReplyDeleteSenators tend to have a disability that prevents them from asking substantial questions. Also, they don't have the part of the brain that most normal people have that lets them know when they've been talking for 15 minutes without letting the other guy get a word in.
They have trouble understanding what they skeptically call "facts," but that should go without saying...they are politicians, after all.
Actually, Mike, the senators were quite restrained compared to the outrageous snippets of the Democrat rants I saw from the House hearing. What you wrote in your comment is generally true; I can't argue with that. I wish I could have caught the Foreign Relations committee hearing, but alas...I was too late.
ReplyDeleteI think some basis for whatever restraint the Dem senators exercised yesterday was fall-out from that insulting MoveOn.org ad. They (the Dems) didn't handle Petraeus/Crocker with kid gloves, but they weren't insulting, either.
G'day Buck,
ReplyDeleteI do like the ``kabuki'' description. Wonderful representation.
Cheers
David
I watched both of 'em - while working of course. Petraeus made so much sense, was so gracious, wise and tactful, objective and...hmm, what's the word I'm looking for here, mature - that's it. These are qualities generally exhibited mostly on the right these days. Certainly not by those actors on the Left. I didn't mind listening to it all just because I'm starved to hear people like Petraeus. The press conference was much better, though.
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of press conferences, I almost cried to see how awful poor Tony Snow is looking right now. I hope he makes it. He's a treasure.
Bec: I suppose the tone of my piece wasn't exactly right, in that I explicitly stated the hearing I watched was a waste of my time. That's not entirely true, for the very same reason you mentioned in your comment: Petraeous was excellent, both in style and substance. And, like you, I'm starved for an authority figure who both understands WHY were doing what we're doing and is an articulate spokesman/advocate for the administration's position. While I'm sure Dubya understands the "whys," he has thus far been a less than articulate motivator/persuader. Petraeus, and to a much lesser extent, Crocker, are filling a huge void.
ReplyDeleteStill and even, I'm afraid I'm not as mature as, or have the remarkable restraint General Petraeus exhibited. I found myself wishing he would deliver a snappy retort to the clue-impaired senators on the dais (e.g., Obama) at many, many points during his testimony.
Finally, I'm surprised no one has taken me to task for my positive comment about Her Hillaryness. VERY surprised! ;-)