Today’s de Rigeur Political Post: There will be massive sadness on the Left today. There is no Fitzmas—not where Karl Rove is concerned, anyway. Or so says Byron York at NRO. In the understatement of the day, York writes:
Rove’s fate has been the subject of intense discussion among critics of the Bush administration. Perhaps foremost among them is former ambassador Joseph Wilson, whose wife, Valerie Plame Wilson, was the CIA employee at the center of the affair. In August 2003, Wilson vowed to pursue Rove vigorously, saying, “At the end of the day it’s of keen interest to me to see whether or not we can get Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs.”
Sorry, Joe. Maybe next time. In the meantime, I’m sure you can find some consolation over at dKos or Firedoglake.
Hockey: OK, I won’t give up my day job. I already did, anyway. A hockey prognosticator I’m not. Carolina is up three games to one after winning last night in Edmonton, 2-1. If they win at home tomorrow night, Carolina will hoist its’ first-ever Stanley Cup. Edmonton has won five Cups, so I don’t feel too bad for them. I missed games two and three of this series; game two because the Yankees were playing the Red Sox Wednesday night and every bar in New England had that game on, not hockey; and game three because it was played Saturday night and I simply had more important things to do. Gasp! I just admitted there are things more important than the Stanley Cup Finals! I shall attempt to atone for that heresy by pouring the day’s first cup into my 1997 Detroit Red Wings Stanley Cup Champions coffee cup. (Yeah, I know. 1100 and I’m just now pouring my first cup of coffee. I was up all night again. I do it because I can.)
Maybe you’ve seen the various videos of the reaction one gets when dropping Mentos mints into Diet Coke or Pepsi. The results can be spectacular. On the other hand, it’s worse than you thought… (hat tip: Morgan at House of Eratosthenes)
More Random Notes: Unmentioned in my travel narrative: finding love notes from the TSA in my checked baggage while unpacking. These “Notice of Baggage Inspection” documents are curiously reassuring. These guys are doing something, even if it’s only placing the notices in your bags. Or taking away your lighter. Still p*ssed about that, ya know.
Speaking of which... (the fact TSA confiscated my USS Mason Zippo) I’m now carrying a brand-new, bright chrome, official USS Monterey (CG 61) Zippo. SN2 gifted me with the Monterey lighter this past Christmas, along with a personalized Monterey ball cap. (SN2 was the Chief Engineer on the Monterey before heading off to the Naval War College .)
One of the great things about being a military Dad is I get all sorts of military paraphernalia, including unit ball caps, from my sons’ assignments. This is very cool, especially since my own personal collection of military mementoes is sadly lacking. I’ve left countless Zippos with unit crests in countless bars over the years, and rather than saving my unit ball caps I wore them until they were worn out, and then threw them away. The upshot is all my souvenirs of days gone by are gone — Bye! SN2 is decidedly different. One of the walls of his home office is covered with pristine ball caps from every assignment he’s ever had in the Navy. The first time I saw that display I was overcome with jealousy and pride. Jealousy in the sense he had the presence of mind to save these things and I didn’t, and I was proud of him for the very same reason. Rod Stewart sang “Every Picture Tells a Story,” and it’s the same with unit ball caps. Except the stories are better.
You can never catch up. I spent the better part of the day yesterday trying to catch up on my favorite blogs after a week of not reading. The bottom line: Mission Impossible. My favorite writers are just so damned prolific that “catching up” is like trying to clean out the Augean Stables. And I’m no Hercules.
Airplane reading: I mentioned I wanted to hit Borders in ABQ to get reading material prior to flying. Well, I did, and I did. Except I didn’t buy what was on the list, specifically Bec’s recommendation ("Nomenklatura" by Michael Voslensky), mainly because I couldn’t find it. I bought Mark Bowden’s “Guests of the Ayatollah” instead. The book is a narrative of the 1979 take-over of the US embassy in Tehran and is a real page-turner. Bowden wrote “Blackhawk Down,” and “Guests” is every bit as good. From the Publishers Weekly review:
Bowden's analysis of militant Islam is clear, current and dead-on. The government of Iran , now as then, is a theocracy with a secular face, combining, he writes, "ignorance with absolute conviction." Anyone who thinks a nuclear-armed Iran could be dealt with through Cold War–style containment should read this book. Guests of the Ayatollah is, however, no academic tome, but a briskly written human story told from every conceivable point of view: the captives and their captors; President Carter's inner circle and Carter himself, struggling to negotiate a release and finally ordering an extremely risky rescue mission; the soldiers of Delta Force, whose audacious attempt failed; Iranian political figures under the thumb of the glowering Ayatollah Khomeini; and a cavalcade of diplomats, journalists, secret agents and barmy peace activists, some of whose actions bordered on treason. The cast of characters would do justice to a 19th-century Russian novel.
I was disappointed at being unable to finish the book on the plane(s), only managing to read 419 of 637 pages. Bowden is a remarkable writer, to say the very least. Highly recommended, if you get the chance…
"Gasp! I just admitted there are things more important than the Stanley Cup Finals!"
ReplyDeleteI can't believe it!
Hey, Buck! Glad you made it home safe and sound.
ReplyDeleteIt was fun to read your posts and see pictures as well! Your Anatasia is a beautiful young gal and she looks really proud and happy. Angelina is a cutie. Must have been wonderful to be there. And those enchiladas looked awfully good. Both FMP’s looked like nice ladies to talk to.
Sorry to have sent you on a wild goose chase over the “Nomenklatura” book. I looked it up and realize it’s not so easy to find. You might find a cheap copy on Amazon if you want to pursue it. I remember now that I ran across my copy at a second hand book store.
Yours sounded really fascinating, though. I’ll have to read it. Funny, because I was just discussing the political situation with a disenchanted Dem who has gone over to the moderate Republican side. (American Future) Many of them state that their disenchantment began with the way that Carter handled the hostage situation. So I’d been doing a little researching (and reminiscing) on the subject lately. An odd coincidence that you should have read a book on that subject! I’d be curious to know your opinion on it - I’ve read that some historians feel that Carter was faced with an impossible situation, and that he wavered back and forth between two diametrically opposed advisers. "President Carter inherited an impossible situation -- and he and his advisers made the worst of it." Did you gain any new insights or understanding?
I think I mentioned once that I worked with one of the Iranian “nomenklatura,” if there was such a thing, under the Shah. Mehringiz told me proudly that the Russians and the Persians were rather close cousins and I believed her. Her way of thinking was always about whom you know and what the appearances of things were and what was behind them and who was out to get whom. (Actually it was 10 times more complicated than that and she was very charming besides.) (No wonder the Russians are so good at chess.) I’ve thought of her often as I’ve been reading my book on the nomenklatura. I’m finally on the last chapter, by the way. Here's a teaser:
He rushes to the door like a man who has been sprinkled with boiling water, but outside in the corridor, he looks as calm and unruffled as as usual, so that no one will notice anything. These people are his colleagues of course, (they go water skiing together on the Klyazma) but actually they are like rats: at the first sign of weakness they would pounce on him and gobble him up. All this from a mildly wayward phone call about some totally (to us) mundane circumstance. Yikes.
As for more current topics – I’ve left the "other" place for good. It was just too weird over there. I feel like someone who, after having been “interested” in someone and invested time in knowing the family and everything, has suddenly come to the realization that I never had anything in common with these people and what was I thinking? But after experiences like this, one always learns more about oneself. And I’ve learned a lot. I don’t even care about Karl Rove anymore. And I can look at Bush now and actually think, “Hmm, maybe this guy knows what he’s doing after all.” Don’t tell anyone.
Thanks for poking your head in over there, Buck. You got me thinking - and your advice and observations, that I’d ask questions and come to my own conclusions, were right on the mark.
Sorry about the length. I always feel like such a hog.
Glad you're back!
Wow, Bec, I'm almost at a loss for words, and that doesn't happen often! This refers to your statement about not having anything in common with the folks at "the other place." I'm glad your questioning and investigation has provided you with answers you can live with, and yeah, I'm also glad you've found you don't have much in common with the other side. Have I ever recommended you take a look at neo's site? I may have, but I honestly don't remember, either way. If you go over there, her series of essays entitled "A mind is a difficult thing to change" are very good reading; links are in her right-hand sidebar about halfway down the page. Neo describes herself this way:
ReplyDeleteI'm a woman in my fifties, lifelong Democrat mugged by reality on 9/11. Born in New York, living in New England, surrounded by liberals on all sides, I've found myself slowly but surely leaving the fold and becoming that dread thing: a neocon. My friends and family are becoming sick of what they see as my inexplicable conversion, so I've started this blog to give vent to my frustration. I have a background as a therapist, and my politics make me a pariah in my profession, too. Little did I know that I moved in such politically homogeneous circles.
I found a lot of interesting parallels between her political conversion experience and my own, aside from the obvious timing and 9/11 differences. But that's a nice segue to the Iranian Hostage Crisis, which was probably the defining series of incidents in MY conversion from liberal to conservative.
As you've noted, hindsight is 20/20, and Carter *did* have an impossible situation on his hands. I'm not at all sure that, had Reagan been in power instead of Carter, he could have resolved the crisis without serious loss of life...both our diplomats and Iranians. The book I'm reading has provided a *lot* of insights, but they're primarily about the Iranian revolution and just how chaotic and brutal Iranian politics were during that period of time. Interestingly, I'm over 400 pages into a 650 page book and am only in February, 1980, chronologically speaking. The tradgedy at Desert One hasn't happened yet, but a lot of the preparations for the abortive rescue attempt have. (I digress) Up to this point Bowden has focused primarily on the hostages and their experiences, and less on the Washington political situation. The conflict between Vance and Brzezinski has been well-detailed so far, but I'm looking forward to more, much more. Another of the more interesting insights the book provides certainly has merit today: the absolute timidity and fecklessness of our "allies" in 1979 when Carter was trying to design and implement *meaningful* sanctions on Iran. Didn't work then, and I doubt it will work now.
Wow, but I DO run on, eh? Thanks for the nice words about the family, Bec. I really appreciate your comments and I'm glad you've decided to hang out here for a bit!